

\n
Assessing critical bleeding<\/h1>Featured Articles<\/a> <\/span><\/span><\/header>\n<\/div><\/section>
\nA near-patient approach to combat post-partum hemorrhage<\/h2>\n
by Catherine Pedrosa<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n
Fibrinogen is an essential part of the blood clotting process, and rapid testing of plasma fibrinogen concentrations aids decision-making in critical care situations, notably in postpartum hemorrhage. In 2020, around 1000 women in the World Health Organization European Region died owing to complications related to pregnancy or childbirth. A recently introduced point-of-care testing system now brings this facility to the near-patient setting, but, for such a vital test, accuracy and quality control are key.<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n
Background<\/strong>
\nFibrinogen is crucial for clot formation and has a significant impact on clinical outcomes when major bleeding occurs. Low plasma levels of functional fibrinogen are linked to inherited or acquired fibrinogen deficiency (perioperative bleeding, trauma, liver disease, abnormal fibrinolysis). Reduced levels are also the first sign of post-partum hemorrhage (PPH), the leading cause of maternal deaths during childbirth worldwide [1].<\/p>\n
Fibrinogen is a glycoprotein synthesized in the liver and normally present at a concentration of 2\u20134 g\/L in plasma. In the third trimester of pregnancy, higher levels (>5 g\/L) can be observed. As part of the coagulation process, fibrinogen is cleaved by thrombin into fibrin monomers that, in the presence of factor XIII, are stabilized to produce the insoluble cross-linked polymer responsible for successful hemostasis.<\/p>\n
It is no surprise, therefore, that the assessment of coagulation status, and fibrinogen testing in particular, is a prime candidate for the application of point-of-care testing (POCT). It provides several benefits for patients and also the healthcare service in general, as it aids clinical decision-making when clinicians are faced with critical hemorrhage, resulting in the need for immediate patient management and treatment.<\/p>\n
It is recognized that PPH can be exacerbated by coagulopathy, where a decline in fibrinogen levels is known to be the first indicator of the condition. However, the clinical utility of laboratory fibrinogen testing to predict PPH progression represents a challenge because \u2018time to results\u2019 can be 60\u201390 minutes. Faced with PPH, this can be too long to wait. The bleed will either have stopped or results are retrospective, with the clinician having relied on empirical transfusion ratios.<\/p>\n
The ability to monitor fibrinogen levels at the point of care within 2\u201310 minutes would enable clinicians to deliver early, targeted fibrinogen replacement that might stem the progression of hemorrhage. It is equally important to be able to monitor and inter-
\npret other coagulation parameters at the same time, as research shows that replacing fibrinogen will not improve outcomes if levels are normal [2].<\/p>\n
One of the barriers to understanding PPH incidence and its risk factors is the lack of a universal definition. Depending on the country or the guideline, PPH may have a different definition. For example, in the UK, PPH is defined as blood loss \u2265500 mL within 24 hours of vaginal delivery, or \u22651000 mL after Caesarean-section delivery. Blood loss that is severe (>2000 mL) or massive (>2500 mL) is defined irrespective of the means of delivery [3].<\/p>\n<\/div><\/section>
\n
A near-patient approach to combat post-partum hemorrhage<\/h2>\n
by Catherine Pedrosa<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n
Fibrinogen is an essential part of the blood clotting process, and rapid testing of plasma fibrinogen concentrations aids decision-making in critical care situations, notably in postpartum hemorrhage. In 2020, around 1000 women in the World Health Organization European Region died owing to complications related to pregnancy or childbirth. A recently introduced point-of-care testing system now brings this facility to the near-patient setting, but, for such a vital test, accuracy and quality control are key.<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n
Background<\/strong>
\nFibrinogen is crucial for clot formation and has a significant impact on clinical outcomes when major bleeding occurs. Low plasma levels of functional fibrinogen are linked to inherited or acquired fibrinogen deficiency (perioperative bleeding, trauma, liver disease, abnormal fibrinolysis). Reduced levels are also the first sign of post-partum hemorrhage (PPH), the leading cause of maternal deaths during childbirth worldwide [1].<\/p>\n
Fibrinogen is a glycoprotein synthesized in the liver and normally present at a concentration of 2\u20134 g\/L in plasma. In the third trimester of pregnancy, higher levels (>5 g\/L) can be observed. As part of the coagulation process, fibrinogen is cleaved by thrombin into fibrin monomers that, in the presence of factor XIII, are stabilized to produce the insoluble cross-linked polymer responsible for successful hemostasis.<\/p>\n
It is no surprise, therefore, that the assessment of coagulation status, and fibrinogen testing in particular, is a prime candidate for the application of point-of-care testing (POCT). It provides several benefits for patients and also the healthcare service in general, as it aids clinical decision-making when clinicians are faced with critical hemorrhage, resulting in the need for immediate patient management and treatment.<\/p>\n
It is recognized that PPH can be exacerbated by coagulopathy, where a decline in fibrinogen levels is known to be the first indicator of the condition. However, the clinical utility of laboratory fibrinogen testing to predict PPH progression represents a challenge because \u2018time to results\u2019 can be 60\u201390 minutes. Faced with PPH, this can be too long to wait. The bleed will either have stopped or results are retrospective, with the clinician having relied on empirical transfusion ratios.<\/p>\n
The ability to monitor fibrinogen levels at the point of care within 2\u201310 minutes would enable clinicians to deliver early, targeted fibrinogen replacement that might stem the progression of hemorrhage. It is equally important to be able to monitor and inter-
\npret other coagulation parameters at the same time, as research shows that replacing fibrinogen will not improve outcomes if levels are normal [2].<\/p>\n
One of the barriers to understanding PPH incidence and its risk factors is the lack of a universal definition. Depending on the country or the guideline, PPH may have a different definition. For example, in the UK, PPH is defined as blood loss \u2265500 mL within 24 hours of vaginal delivery, or \u22651000 mL after Caesarean-section delivery. Blood loss that is severe (>2000 mL) or massive (>2500 mL) is defined irrespective of the means of delivery [3].<\/p>\n<\/div><\/section>
\n
\nFibrinogen is crucial for clot formation and has a significant impact on clinical outcomes when major bleeding occurs. Low plasma levels of functional fibrinogen are linked to inherited or acquired fibrinogen deficiency (perioperative bleeding, trauma, liver disease, abnormal fibrinolysis). Reduced levels are also the first sign of post-partum hemorrhage (PPH), the leading cause of maternal deaths during childbirth worldwide [1].<\/p>\n
\npret other coagulation parameters at the same time, as research shows that replacing fibrinogen will not improve outcomes if levels are normal [2].<\/p>\n
\n