Prins Hendrikstraat 1
5611HH Eindhoven
The Netherlands
info@clinlabint.com
PanGlobal Media is not responsible for any error or omission that might occur in the electronic display of product or company data.
November 2025
The leading international magazine for Clinical laboratory Equipment for everyone in the Vitro diagnostics
Prins Hendrikstraat 1
5611HH Eindhoven
The Netherlands
info@clinlabint.com
PanGlobal Media is not responsible for any error or omission that might occur in the electronic display of product or company data.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept settingsHide notification onlyCookie settingsWe may ask you to place cookies on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience and to customise your relationship with our website.
Click on the different sections for more information. You can also change some of your preferences. Please note that blocking some types of cookies may affect your experience on our websites and the services we can provide.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to provide the website, refusing them will affect the functioning of our site. You can always block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and block all cookies on this website forcibly. But this will always ask you to accept/refuse cookies when you visit our site again.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies, but to avoid asking you each time again to kindly allow us to store a cookie for that purpose. You are always free to unsubscribe or other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies, we will delete all cookies set in our domain.
We provide you with a list of cookies stored on your computer in our domain, so that you can check what we have stored. For security reasons, we cannot display or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser's security settings.
.These cookies collect information that is used in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customise our website and application for you to improve your experience.
If you do not want us to track your visit to our site, you can disable this in your browser here:
.
We also use various external services such as Google Webfonts, Google Maps and external video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data such as your IP address, you can block them here. Please note that this may significantly reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will only be effective once you reload the page
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Maps Settings:
Google reCaptcha settings:
Vimeo and Youtube videos embedding:
.U kunt meer lezen over onze cookies en privacy-instellingen op onze Privacybeleid-pagina.
Privacy policy
Team finds mechanism linking key inflammatory marker to cancer
, /in E-News /by 3wmediaIn a new study, researchers reveal how a key player in cell growth, immunity and the inflammatory response can be transformed into a primary contributor to tumour growth.
Scientists call this Jekyll-and-Hyde molecule NF-kappa B. In healthy cells, it is a powerful ‘first responder,’ a vital part of the body’s immune and inflammatory responses. It spends most of its life in the cell’s cytoplasm, quietly awaiting orders. But when extracellular signals – of a viral or bacterial invasion, for example – set off chemical alarms, the cell unchains this warhorse, allowing it to go into the nucleus where it spurs a flurry of defensive activity, including the transcription of genes that trigger inflammation, promote cell proliferation and undermine cell death.
Researchers have known for years that a hyperactive form of NF-kappa B that gets into the nucleus and stays there is associated with various cancers. But they didn’t know what was keeping it active in the nucleus.
‘Normally in the cell NF-kappa B is in the cytosol, it’s not in the nucleus, and it’s not activated,’ said University of Illinois medical biochemistry professor Lin-Feng Chen, who led the new study. ‘You have to stimulate normal cells to see NF-kappa B in the nucleus. But in cancer cells without any stimulation you can see this nuclear form of NF-kappa B. The cell just won’t die because of this. That is why NF-kappa B is so important in cancer.’
In the new study, Chen’s group found that another molecule known to help regulate gene expression, called BRD4, recognises a specific amino acid on a subunit of the NF-kappa B protein complex after the amino acid has been marked with a specific tag, called an acetyl group. This ‘acetylation’ allows the BRD4 to bind to NF-kappa B, activating it and preventing its degradation in cancer cells.
Previous studies had shown that BRD4’s recognition of the acetylated subunit increased NF-kappa B activation, but this recognition had not been linked to cancer.
BRD4 belongs to a class of molecules that can recognise chemical markers on other proteins and interact with them to spur the marked proteins to perform new tasks. Chemical ‘readers’ such as BRD4 are important players in the field of epigenetics, which focuses on how specific genes are regulated.
‘In epigenetics, there are writers, there are readers and there are erasers,’ Chen said. The writers make modifications to proteins after they are formed, without changing the underlying sequence of the gene that codes for them. These modifications (such as acetylation) signal other molecules (the readers) to engage with the marked proteins in various ways, allowing the proteins to fulfill new roles in the life of the cell. Epigenetic erasers remove the marks when they are no longer of use.
Such protein modifications ‘have been shown to be critically involved in transcription regulation and cancer development,’ the researchers report.
To test whether BRD4 was contributing to the sustained presence of NF-kappa B in the nucleus of cancer cells, Chen and his colleagues exposed lung cancer cells in cell culture and in immune-deficient mice to JQ1, a drug that interferes with BRD4 activity. Exposure to JQ1 blocked the interaction of BRD4 and NF-kappa B, blocked the expression of genes regulated by NF-kappa B, reduced proliferation of lung cancer cells and suppressed the ability of lung cancer cells to induce tumors in immune-deficient mice, the researchers found.
The researchers also discovered that depletion of BRD4 or the treatment of cells with JQ1 induced the degradation of the NF-kappa B subunit recognized by BRD4.
Chen said that BRD4 likely prevents other molecules from recognising the hyperactive NF-kappa B in the nucleus and marking it for degradation.
‘This is an example of how epigenetic regulators and NF-kappa B may one day be targeted for the treatment of cancer,’ he said. University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
New test better detects elephantiasis worm infection
, /in E-News /by 3wmediaA new diagnostic test for a worm infection that can lead to severe enlargement and deformities of the legs and genitals is far more sensitive than the currently used test, according to results of a field study in Liberia, in West Africa, where the infection is endemic.
The new test found evidence of the infection – lymphatic filariasis – in many more people that the standard test had missed.
The study, the first to independently evaluate the new test, was led by researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis and funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
The infection affects 120 million people living in 73 countries, leaving some 40 million profoundly disfigured and incapacitated. Both tests detect the presence of worms that cause lymphatic filariasis, a devastating mosquito-borne illness also known as elephantiasis.
But the new test has significant advantages over the test that has been used for more than a decade not only to diagnose the disease, but to map, monitor and evaluate the success of a massive global public health program aimed at completely eliminating the disease by 2020.
‘The older test has had a major impact, but the new one is even better,’ says lead author Gary J. Weil, MD, an infectious diseases specialist at Washington University School of Medine. ‘Annually, medication to treat and prevent the infection is distributed to more than 500 million people worldwide. The improved sensitivity of the new test will help determine whether the mass treatment program has been effective and also identify regions that need additional attention.’
An accompanying editorial by Maria Rebollo, MD, and Moses Bockarie, PhD, at the Centre for Neglected Tropical Diseases in the United Kingdom says the new diagnostic test ‘represents a major breakthrough for rapid diagnosis of lymphatic filariasis in the blood.’
The new test also has a longer shelf life, estimated at two years without refrigeration, compared with three months for the older version, and is expected to cost less.
Weil’s research team worked with colleagues at the Liberian Institute for Medical Research to conduct a side-by-side comparison of the new test strip and the currently used test. They evaluated the tests in 503 people ranging in age from 6 to 89.
Both versions of the test are manufactured by Alere Scarborough Inc. of Maine and detect the presence in the blood of a protein produced by the worm parasite Wuchereria bancrofti that causes lymphatic filariasis. The new test is performed by pricking the finger and placing a person’s blood onto the test strip, which looks similar to an over-the-counter pregnancy test. Like many pregnancy tests, the lymphatic filariasis test is positive if two lines appear in the test window and negative if only one line shows.
The study’s results show that the new test is highly sensitive, detecting nearly 26 percent more infections of lymphatic filariasis than the standard test (124/503 infections vs. 98/503 infections). The new test also was easier to perform and results were easier to read.
‘This gives us some indication of the numbers of infections we were missing with the older test,’ Weil says. ‘On a global scale, it’s a huge number of cases. We need to have an accurate test to be sure we are reaching all the people who have the disease or are at risk of developing it.’
Worldwide, some 1.4 billion people are at risk of lymphatic filariasis, which is endemic in many countries in Africa, Southeast Asia and other tropical regions. Worm larvae deposited by the bite of an infected mosquito enter the body and migrate to the lymphatic system, where they mature into adult worms.
The thread-like parasitic worms can live and reproduce in the body for years. Ultimately, this damages the lymphatic vessels that drain fluid from the tissues and causes the enormous swelling and disabling deformity of the legs and in males, the scrotum.
Weil has been active for years in efforts to eliminate lymphatic filariasis via mass drug administration, an approach that involves giving antifilarial drugs to everyone in areas with high infection rates. Organizers of the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis, launched in 2000, co-ordinate periodic, repeated mass drug administration of antifilarial medications to more than 500 million people annually, making it the world’s largest public health intervention program based on mass drug administration. Washington University School of Medicine
WHO urges information sharing over novel coronavirus
, /in E-News /by 3wmediaThe World Health Organisation (WHO) has urged countries with possible cases of novel coronavirus to share information. The move comes after Saudi Arabia said the development of diagnostic tests had been delayed by patent rights on the NCoV virus by commercial laboratories.
Twenty-two deaths and 44 cases have been reported worldwide since 2012, the WHO says. NCoV is from the same family of viruses as the one that caused Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (Sars). An outbreak of Sars in 2003 killed about 770 people. However, NCoV and Sars are distinct from each other, the WHO says.
The virus first emerged in Saudi Arabia, which is where most cases have since arisen. Saudi Deputy Health Minister Ziad Memish raised his concerns at the World Health Assembly in Geneva.
‘We are still struggling with diagnostics and the reason is that the virus was patented by scientists and is not allowed to be used for investigations by other scientists,’ he said. ‘I think strongly that the delay in the development of … diagnostic procedures is related to the patenting of the virus.’
WHO chief Margaret Chan expressed dismay at the information.
‘Why would your scientists send specimens out to other laboratories on [sic] a bilateral manner and allow other people to take intellectual property rights on a new disease?’ she asked.
‘Any new disease is full of uncertainty.’
She is urging the WHO’s 194 member states to only share ‘viruses and specimens with WHO collaborating centres… not in a bilateral manner.’
She added: ‘I will follow it up. I will look at the legal implications together with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. No IP (intellectual property) should stand in the way of you, the countries of the world, to protect your people.’ BBC
Genetic predictors of postpartum depression
, /in E-News /by 3wmediaJohns Hopkins researchers say they have discovered specific chemical alterations in two genes that, when present during pregnancy, reliably predict whether a woman will develop postpartum depression.
The epigenetic modifications, which alter the way genes function without changing the underlying DNA sequence, can apparently be detected in the blood of pregnant women during any trimester, potentially providing a simple way to foretell depression in the weeks after giving birth, and an opportunity to intervene before symptoms become debilitating.
The findings are of the small study involving 52 pregnant women.
‘Postpartum depression can be harmful to both mother and child,’ says study leader Zachary Kaminsky, Ph.D., an assistant professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. ‘But we don’t have a reliable way to screen for the condition before it causes harm, and a test like this could be that way.’
It is not clear what causes postpartum depression, a condition marked by persistent feelings of sadness, hopelessness, exhaustion and anxiety that begins within four weeks of childbirth and can last weeks, several months or up to a year. An estimated 10 to 18 percent of all new mothers develop the condition, and the rate rises to 30 to 35 percent among women with previously diagnosed mood disorders. Scientists long believed the symptoms were related to the large drop-off in the mother’s oestrogen levels following childbirth, but studies have shown that both depressed and non-depressed women have similar oestrogen levels.
By studying mice, the Johns Hopkins researchers suspected that oestrogen induced epigenetic changes in cells in the hippocampus, a part of the brain that governs mood. Kaminsky and his team then created a complicated statistical model to find the candidate genes most likely undergoing those epigenetic changes, which could be potential predictors for postpartum depression. That process resulted in the identification of two genes, known as TTC9B and HP1BP3, about which little is known save for their involvement in hippocampal activity.
Kaminsky says the genes in question may have something to do with the creation of new cells in the hippocampus and the ability of the brain to reorganise and adapt in the face of new environments — two elements important in mood. In some ways, he says, oestrogen can behave like an antidepressant, so that when inhibited, it adversely affects mood.
The researchers later confirmed their findings in humans by looking for epigenetic changes to thousands of genes in blood samples from 52 pregnant women with mood disorders. Jennifer L. Payne, M.D., director of the Johns Hopkins Women’s Mood Disorders Center, collected the blood samples. The women were followed both during and after pregnancy to see who developed postpartum depression.
The researchers noticed that women who developed postpartum depression exhibited stronger epigenetic changes in those genes that are most responsive to oestrogen, suggesting that these women are more sensitive to the hormone’s effects. Specifically, two genes were most highly correlated with the development of postpartum depression. TTC9B and HP1BP3 predicted with 85 percent certainty which women became ill. John Hopkins Medicine
Family studies suggest rare genetic mutations team up to cause schizophrenia
, /in E-News /by 3wmediaUsing a novel method of analysing genetic variations in families, researchers at Johns Hopkins have found that individually harmless genetic variations affecting related biochemical processes may team up to increase the risk of schizophrenia. They say their findings bring some clarity to the murky relationship between genetics and schizophrenia, and may lead to a genetic test that can predict which medications will be effective for individual patients.
‘It’s long been clear that schizophrenia runs in families, but schizophrenia as a simple inherited disease didn’t make sense from an evolutionary point of view because people with the disease tend to have fewer children and the disease-causing genetic variants shouldn’t survive,’ says Dimitri Avramopoulos, M.D., Ph.D., an associate professor of psychiatry in the McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine. Moreover, he says, studies searching for schizophrenia-linked gene variants have found only weak connections to a few genes — nothing that would explain the persistent prevalence of the disease, which affects about 1 percent of the population.
Most geneticists believe that the culprit in so-called complex genetic diseases such as schizophrenia is not just one genetic variant, but more than one acting in concert. It’s also likely that individual cases of the disease are caused by different combinations of variants, Avramopoulos says. He and fellow researchers took this hypothesis a step further, theorising that while our bodies can usually compensate for one faulty gene that affects a particular system, more than one hit to the same system is likely to tip people toward disease.
The research team devised a technique for analysing gene-sequencing data that explores whether variants cluster in a subset of cases in a non-random way. After finding support for their hypothesis in previously obtained data on 123 families with at least two schizophrenia-affected members, they decided to sequence genes connected through a biochemical chain reaction that has been linked to the disease in 48 inpatients. Known as the neuregulin signalling pathway, that chain reaction relays signals within the nervous system.
As they had predicted, the researchers found that some of the families had multiple neuregulin signalling-related variants while others had none, a distribution that was highly unlikely to result from chance. Moreover, the schizophrenia patients with neuregulin signalling variants experienced more hallucinations but less impairment than the other schizophrenia patients in the study.
‘These results support the idea that there’s no single genetic recipe for schizophrenia, but that a build-up of mutations in a pathway related to the disease — like neuregulin signalling — can be the culprit,’ Avramopoulos says. ‘The results are also evidence for the current theory that schizophrenia isn’t a single disease at all, but a suite of related disorders.’ Those patients in the study who did not have neuregulin signalling-related variants likely carried variants in a different pathway instead, he notes.
While the results of the study were surprisingly clear-cut given the small number of families in the study, Avramopoulos cautions that larger studies are needed to confirm the results before drawing any firm conclusions. He also plans to study the exact roles of the schizophrenia-linked variants the team identified. Finally, the encouraging results mean it would be worthwhile to apply the new analytic method to other common diseases, such as diabetes and heart disease, which also appear to have complex genetic roots. John Hopkins University School of Medicine
New genetic tests, more information
, /in E-News /by 3wmediaOur ability to analyse the genetic make-up of the human body has rapidly improved over the last few decades. The genetic basis of different diseases is gradually being deciphered through scientific research and more and more people are having genetic tests to diagnose or predict illness within the health care system.
Genetic tests developed over the past thirty years have focussed on identifying the cause for a range of different conditions. Targeted genetic testing looking at particular genes within the genetic code has thus been widely used. Techniques have now moved on so much, that it is often easier and cheaper to examine the entire genetic code, rather than home in on particular genes suggested by symptoms or a family history.
Genetic tests to date have therefore largely been done to answer particular questions; ‘Have I got a high chance of breast cancer?’ or ‘Have I inherited the condition in my family?’ Modern day genetic testing can also answer questions we haven’t posed, and which might reveal entirely unexpected risk of disease.
But what do our genes really say about us? And what if a genetic test showed something that wasn’t expected that could affect you in later life? And what is the effect on the individual’s family?
The University of Southampton is currently conducting a study, funded by Cancer Research UK and National Institute for Health Research, which is exploring the ethical issues in discovering unexpected genetic test results otherwise known as incidental findings (IFs). Through interviews with patients and health professionals the study is outlining how future clinical practice may have to change to incorporate the possibility discovering such incidental findings.
Professor Anneke Lucassen, a clinical geneticist at the University of Southampton and consultant in clinical genetics at Southampton General Hospital, comments: ‘Moving from targeted to broad genetic testing is resulting in a growing ethical and moral debate about how such tests should be used. There are questions we need to be thinking about as new technologies enter mainstream use.
‘Unlike an X-ray where you might unexpectedly find a tumour that needs management now, with genetic testing you might predict something that could happen in 10 or 20 years’ time. If you predict a genetic disease with any certainty, you are also potentially predicting something about their relatives who have not asked for the test. Should their relatives be told that they might also be at risk?
‘Medical technology is advancing at a rapid rate and could help a lot of people and their families, but the clinical guidelines and the advice for health professionals about communication and decision making needs to catch up.’
Anyone wanting to take part in the study should email cels@soton.ac.uk University of Southampton
Advanced paper could be foundation for inexpensive biomedical and diagnostic devices
, /in E-News /by 3wmediaPaper is known for its ability to absorb liquids, making it ideal for products such as paper towels. But by modifying the underlying network of cellulose fibres, etching off surface ‘fluff’ and applying a thin chemical coating, researchers have created a new type of paper that repels a wide variety of liquids – including water and oil.
The paper takes advantage of the so-called ‘lotus effect’ – used by leaves of the lotus plant – to repel liquids through the creation of surface patterns at two different size scales and the application of a chemical coating. The material, developed at the Georgia Institute of Technology, uses nanometer- and micron-scale structures, plus a surface fluorocarbon, to turn old-fashioned paper into an advanced material.
The modified paper could be used as the foundation for a new generation of inexpensive biomedical diagnostics in which liquid samples would flow along patterns printed on the paper using special hydrophobic ink and an ordinary desktop printer. This paper could also provide an improved packaging material that would be less expensive than other oil- and water-repelling materials, while being both recyclable and sustainable.
‘Paper is a very heterogeneous material composed of fibres with different sizes, different lengths and a non-circular cross-section,’ said Dennis Hess, a professor in the Georgia Tech School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering. ‘We believe this is the first time that a superamphiphobic surface – one that repels all fluids – has been created on a flexible, traditional and heterogeneous material like paper.’
The new paper, which is both superhydrophobic (water-repelling) and super oleophobic (oil-repelling), can be made from standard softwood and hardwood fibres using a modified paper process. In addition to Hess, the research team included Lester Li, a graduate research assistant, and Victor Breedveld, an associate professor in the School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
Producing the new paper begins with breaking up cellulose fibres into smaller structures using a mechanical grinding process. As in traditional paper processing, the fibres are then pressed in the presence of water – but then the water is removed and additional processing is done with the chemical butanol. Use of butanol inhibits the hydrogen bonding that normally takes place between cellulose fibres, allowing better control of their spacing.
‘The desirable properties we are seeking are mainly controlled by the geometry of the fibres,’ Hess explained.
The second step involves using an oxygen plasma etching process – a technique commonly used in the microelectronics industry – to remove the layer of amorphous ‘fluffy’ cellulose surface material, exposing the crystalline cellulose nanofibrils. The process thereby uncovers smaller cellulose structures and provides a second level of ‘roughness’ with the proper geometry needed to repel liquids.
Finally, a thin coating of a fluoropolymer is applied over the network of cellulose fibers. In testing, the paper was able to repel water, motor oil, ethylene glycol and n-hexadecane solvent.
The researchers have printed patterns onto their paper using a hydrophobic ink and a desktop printer. Droplets applied to the pattern remain on the ink pattern, repelled by the adjacent superamphiphobic surface.
That capability could facilitate development of inexpensive biomedical diagnostic tests in which a droplet containing antigens could be rolled along a printed surface where it would encounter diagnostic chemicals. If appropriate reagents are used, the specific colour or colour intensity of the patterns could indicate the presence of a disease. Because the droplets adhere tightly to the printed lines or dots, the samples can be sent to a laboratory for additional testing.
‘We have shown that we can do the operations necessary for a microfluidic device,’ Hess said. ‘We can move the droplet along a pattern, split the droplet and transfer the droplet from one piece of paper to another. We can do all of these operations on a two-dimensional surface.’
For Hess, Li and Breedveld, creating a superhydrophobic suface was relatively straightforward because water has a high surface tension. For oils, which have a low surface tension, the key to creating the repellent surface is to create re-entrant – or undercut – angles between the droplets and the surface.
Previous examples of superamphiphobic surfaces have been made on rigid surfaces through lithographic techniques. Such processes tend to produce fragile surfaces that are prone to damage, Hess said.
The principal challenge has been to create high-performance in a material that is anything but geometrically regular and consistent.
‘Working with heterogeneous materials is fascinating, but it’s very difficult not just to control them, because there is no inherent consistent structure, but also to change the processing conditions so you can get something that, on average, is what you need,’ he said. ‘It’s been a real learning experience for us.’
The new paper has so far been made in samples about four inches on a side, but Hess sees no reason why the process couldn’t be scaled up. Though long-term testing of the new paper hasn’t been done, Hess is encouraged by what he’s seen so far. Georgia Institute of Technology
NTRK1: a new oncogene and target in lung cancer
, /in E-News /by 3wmediaTo the list of oncogenic drivers of lung cancer that includes ALK, EGFR, ROS1 and RET, results of a University of Colorado Cancer Center study presented at ASCO 2013 show that mutations in the gene NTRK1 cause a subset of lung cancers.
‘We’re reconceptualising lung cancer as many, related diseases. And we need to learn to identify and treat each individually. We can treat the forms of the disease that depend on ALK and EGFR mutations. We’re getting very close to treating lung cancers that depend on ROS1 and RET. And now we show another oncogenic driver of the disease that begs its own targeted treatment,’ says Robert C. Doebele, MD, PhD, investigator at the CU Cancer Center and assistant professor of medical oncology at the CU School of Medicine.
The group, in collaboration with Pasi A. Jänne, MD, PhD from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, started with lung cancer tumour samples from 36 ‘pan-negative’ patients, meaning that no other driver oncogene had been identified. So if not EGFR, ALK and the like, what was driving the cancer? Doebele and colleagues took the question to Foundation Medicine (Cambridge, MA), which used targeted, next-gen sequencing to analyse the samples for possible mutations in a couple hundred potential oncogenes identified as drivers of other cancers. NTRK1 had been identified as a driver of thyroid cancer and so was included in the panel (though drug development had stalled due in part to the relative rarity of the thyroid disease). Sure enough, next-gen sequencing identified NTRK1 gene fusions as the potential driver in two of these samples.
Doebele and colleagues took the lead back to the CU labs, where Marileila Varella Garcia, PhD, developed a specific test for NTRK1 fusions based on fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), similar to what is used for ALK, ROS1 and RET fusions. This allowed the group to validate the finding of NRTK1 as a novel oncogene in these patient samples.
But the study went a step beyond identifying the oncogene. Doebele describes the relative ease with which genes that are improperly activated can be silenced – ‘whether a drug is already is in clinical trials, or already approved for another cancer, or just sitting on the pharma shelf somewhere, many drugs exist that turn off these candidate genes,’ Doebele says.
In this case, Doebele describes ‘walking up the street to Array BioPharma (Boulder, CO), who happened to have several compounds specific for this gene.’
The group showed that mutated NRTK1 genes in cells treated with drug candidates ARRY-772, -523, and -470 and others was effectively turned off.
‘This is still preclinical work,’ Doebele says, ‘but it’s the first – and maybe even second and third! – important steps toward picking off another subset of lung cancer with a treatment targeted to the disease’s specific genetic weaknesses.’ University of Colorado Cancer Center
Researchers identify genetic signature of deadly brain cancer
, /in E-News /by 3wmediaA multi-institutional team of researchers have pinpointed the genetic traits of the cells that give rise to gliomas – the most common form of malignant brain cancer. The findings provide scientists with rich new potential set of targets to treat the disease.
‘This study identifies a core set of genes and pathways that are dysregulated during both the early and late stages of tumour progression,’ said University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC) neurologist Steven Goldman, M.D., Ph.D., the senior author of the study and co-director of the Center for Translational Neuromedicine. ‘By virtue of their marked difference from normal cells, these genes appear to comprise a promising set of targets for therapeutic intervention.’
As its name implies, gliomas arise from a cell type found in the central nervous system called the glial cell. Gliomas progress in severity over time and ultimately become highly invasive tumours known as glioblastomas, which are difficult to treat and almost invariably fatal. Current treatments, which include surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, can delay disease progression, but ultimately prove ineffective.
Cancer research has been transformed over the past several years by new concepts arising from stem cell biology. Scientists now appreciate that many cancers are the result of rogue stem cells or their offspring, known as progenitor cells. Traditional cancer therapies often do not prevent a recurrence of the disease since they may not effectively target and destroy the cancer-causing stem cells that lie at the heart of the tumours.
Gliomas are one such example. The source of the cancer is a cell found in the brain called the glial progenitor cell. The cells, which arise from and maintain characteristics of stem cells, comprise about three percent of the cell population of the human brain. When these cells become cancerous they are transformed into glioma stem cells, essentially glial progenitor cells whose molecular machinery has gone awry, resulting in uncontrolled cell division.
Goldman and his team have long studied normal glial progenitor cells. These cells produce glia, a category that includes both astrocytes – cells that support the function of neurons – and oligodendrocytes – cells that produces myelin, the fatty insulation that allows the long-distance conduction of neural impulses.
While Goldman’s group’s work has primarily focused on ways to use glial progenitor cells to treat neurological disorders such as multiple sclerosis, their understanding of the biology of these cells and mastery of the techniques required to sort, identify, and isolate these cells has also enabled them to explore the molecular and genetic changes that transform these cells into cancers.
Using human tissue samples representing the three principal stages of the cancer, the researchers were able to identify and isolate the cancer-inducing stem cells. Working with Goldman, lead authors Romane Auvergne, Ph.D. and Fraser Sim, Ph.D. then compared the gene expression profiles of these cancer stem cells to those of normal glial progenitor cells. The objective was to both pinpoint the earliest genetic changes associated with cancer formation and identify those genes that were unique to the cancer stem cells and were expressed at every stage of disease progression.
Out of a pool over 44,000 tested genes and sequences, the scientists identified a small set of genes in the cancerous glioma progenitor cells that were over-expressed at all stages of malignancy. These genes formed a unique ‘signature’ that identified the tumour progenitor cells and enabled the scientists to define a corresponding set of potential therapeutic targets present throughout all stages of the cancer.
‘One of the key things you are looking for in drug development in cancer is a protein or gene that is over-expressed, so that you can attempt to achieve therapeutic benefit by inhibiting it,’ said Goldman.
The researchers chose to test this hypothesis by targeting one such gene, called SIX1, which was highly over-expressed in the glioma progenitor cells. While this particular gene is active in the early development of the nervous system, it had not been observed in the adult brain before. However, SIX1 signalling has been associated with breast and ovarian cancer, raising the possibility of its contribution to brain cancer as well. This turned out to indeed be the case. When the researchers blocked – or knocked down – the expression of this gene, the tumour cells ceased growing, and implanted tumours shrank.
‘This study gives us a blueprint to develop new therapies,’ said Goldman. ‘We can now devise a strategy to systematically and rationally analyse – and eliminate – glioma stem and progenitor cells using compounds that may selectively target these cells, relative to the normal glial progenitors from which they derive. By targeting genes like SIX1 that are expressed at all stages of glioma progression, we hope to be able to effectively treat gliomas regardless of their stage of malignancy. And by targeting the glioma-initiating cells in particular, we hope to lessen the likelihood of recurrence of these tumours, regardless of the stage at which we initiate treatment.’ University of Rochester Medical Center
New Disease-to-Drug genetic matching puts snowboarder back on slopes
, /in E-News /by 3wmediaA recent article describes genetic testing of a rare blood cancer called atypical chronic neutrophilic leukaemia (CNL) that revealed a new mutation present in most patients with the disease. The mutation also serves as an Achilles heel, allowing doctors at the University of Colorado Cancer Center to prescribe a never-before-used, targeted treatment. The first patient treated describes his best snowboarding season ever.
‘I’m a crazy sports fan,’ says the patient. ‘I go 30 days a season. I may be the oldest guy snowboarding on the mountain, but I’m not the slowest!’
When he lost a few pounds from what eventually proved to be undiagnosed cancer, the patient was initially pleased. ‘I was lighter and could snowboard better – ride better, jump better,’ he says. Then he took a blood test and his white blood cell count was far in excess of the normal range. His doctor couldn’t find a cause and so they watched and waited. A couple months later, another blood test showed his white count was even higher.
‘That’s when I decided to go to the University of Colorado Hospital,’ he says. There he met Daniel A. Pollyea, MD, MS, CU Cancer Center investigator, assistant professor and clinical director of Leukemia Services at the University of Colorado School of Medicine, and co-author of what would become the recent study.
‘Pollyea said my illness didn’t fit into any major categories,’ the patient says. ‘I could see in his face that he’d run into something abnormal, something new. He was aggressive but didn’t force his own opinion. I saw him reach out to every source he could find – every other specialist he could get in contact with.’
‘He’d been sent from doctor to doctor being told incorrect information,’ Pollyea says. ‘By the time we saw him, his blood counts were going in a bad direction due to the progression of his leukaemia.’
Pollyea had worked on blood cancers since his fellowship training at Stanford University, and through his work there developed a relationship with researchers at the University of Oregon, which had an ongoing project in blood cancers that defied common classifications. Pollyea and his team took a sample from his patient and sent it to Oregon for testing, with the hopes that if they could identify a gene mutation causing this cancer, there might be a chance they could target the mutation with an existing drug.
Sure enough, sequencing showed a mutation in a gene that makes a protein called colony-stimulating factor 3 (CSF3R). Cells with this mutation have uncontrolled growth in the bone marrow, resulting in a leukaemia.
Further studies revealed a drug, ruxolitinib, could effectively target cells with this mutation. Approved to treat another condition, myelofibrosis, just months before, the drug hadn’t previously been considered as a treatment for this type of leukaemia. But with dwindling options, Pollyea and colleagues decided ruxolitinib was worth a try.
‘There were no good alternatives other than to use the ruxolitinib,’ Pollyea says. ‘Our patient became the first person with this condition who received this treatment. His white blood count came down, his other blood counts normalised, and his symptoms virtually disappeared.’
‘I had my best snowboarding season ever,’ says the patient. ‘Good, late season snow here in Colorado. Actually, I’d lived elsewhere and when I first got the disease I wondered if maybe something about moving to Colorado made it happen – you know, the altitude, the lack of oxygen. But now after working with Dr. Pollyea, I realise that I didn’t get sick because I live here, I got cured because I live here. Would I have had this kind of treatment anywhere else? I’m not so sure.’ University of Colorado Cancer Center